Home > May 2017 > May 19, 2017 Oil And Loonie has been pushing up all week.

May 19, 2017 Oil And Loonie has been pushing up all week.

Oil continues to push up, .84% right now.  Our Futures are up .20%. Shanghai Futures was positive even with news that Hong Kong will get additional property restriction. Canada today will be getting core CPI and core Retail Sales data, with the Loonie being on fire this week. I would expect profit taking will be taken on the loonie when data shows that the Canadian CPI pushed up. This should also move down the Oil price when Loonie sells. Still, though this market is on pins and needles over the Political Issues (US, Brazil and even Iran will be having elections). So we are at it’s mercy.

May 2017

  • panther341

    DE earnings were this morning. Like CAT – alot of its sales are international. They boosted guidance from 4% to 9%, and South America was strong. LOL Stuff like this encourages bulls. :)))))

  • Trading_Nymph

    Very True..I have to go look at the call transcripts later

  • Trading_Nymph

    Just Crazy Day,,,

  • Trading_Nymph

    Canada CPI and Retail Sales missed estimates. USD/CAD down .64%

  • Trading_Nymph

    Panther…They still haven’t transcribed the DE conf call. Wonder how much of that South AMerican pop came from sales to Brazil? lol. May have a bit of problem QoQ when they report again. lol

  • Trading_Nymph

    On DE From CNBC in Feb 2017…By segment, the company sees full-year worldwide sales in the agriculture and turf equipment business increasing by about 3 percent, compared with a 1 percent decline previously expected. Improvement in Brazil is one of the big reasons for the improved outlook.

    “Profitability for Brazilian farmers remains at good levels as crops are sold in dollars,” Jepsen said. Fundamentals in the country are improving, with the crop value of agriculture production expected to increase about 8 percent in U.S. dollar terms due to record acreage and expected yields.

    Also helping is more budgeting for government-sponsored financial programs in the country’s agriculture sector. Brazilian crops are becoming more competitive with the U.S. agriculture industry.

  • Trading_Nymph

    Well that explains how Brazil got the money to buy DE products..lol.. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-corruption-idUSKCN18C1M1

  • Trading_Nymph

    Good Piece by Andy H on COT fake out…
    The London Metal Exchange (LME) started publishing its Commitments of Traders Report (COTR) in July 2014.

    It came after calls, primarily from the exchange’s industrial users, for more transparency, first and foremost about the exchange’s financial users.

    The “money manager” category, it was hoped, would light up the path of the money men as they moved through the markets.

    And to an extent it has.

    The COTR figures have inserted themselves into the base metals narrative, just as in other parts of the commodities universe.

    But are they enlightening or misleading us?

    How do we explain, for example, why the funds just about always seem to have been long LME copper, even when the market was in the final throes of a five-year price slump?

    And since the LME’s COTR is but a carbon copy of that used in U.S. markets, how comfortable are we with the fact that funds earlier this year built a long position on the CME copper contract that eclipsed anything ever seen before?

    Are these reports painting a true picture of fund activity in copper?

    Or are we being blinded by transparency?

    Graphic on money manager positioning in LME copper:

    tmsnrt.rs/2ryrQGv

    Graphic on money manager positioning on CME copper:

    tmsnrt.rs/2ry7BIX

    A DIFFERENT TAKE

    There is an interesting comparison to be made between the COTR version of fund positioning in LME copper and that published by LME broker Marex Spectron.

    The two might be said to travel in the same direction most of the time but often with very different readings.

    Marex’s latest assessment is that funds are marginally net long of LME copper to the tune of 1,700 lots, or around 0.9 percent of open interest.

    The LME COTR, however, shows a net money manager long of 40,338 lots, or almost 9 percent of open interest.

    It’s a big difference, isn’t it?

    And one that Marex Spectron’s global head of analytics, Guy Wolf, has recently tackled in a research note with the self-explanatory title “Base Metals Bull Market”.

    Marex uses what it calls its “Nanolytics” methodology to track speculative positioning.

    It’s a fancy word for reassembling all the data that exists around any trade, the number and type of bids and asks, the speed of response, all the stuff that was once intuitive to a human floor trader but is now lost in the electronic ether.

    Given the speed of trading, often at milliseconds and faster, it takes a lot of computing power but Wolf’s view is that what computers rent apart, computers can reunite.

    KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER

    The first big problem with the COTR methodology, according to Wolf, is one of classification.

    Any user can only be placed in one category determined by their “predominant activity”.

    Imagine you’re the broker having to work out the appropriate box to tick for a client. The client is a big fund manager with large amounts of money invested in a broad passive commodity index. But the client also runs an active metals fund, which generates more trading volume with greater frequency.

    You’ll probably choose “money manager”, but if you do, you’ve just also moved the client’s index-linked holdings out of the “broker dealer index trader” category.

    Such seepage of passive money into what should denote active money is a recurring and volatile theme across many commodity markets, according to Wolf, but one that is compounded further by the nature of the LME.

    The LME’s own figures show that its members account for a substantial 49 percent of total open interest.

    “There is no visibility on the originator” of positions sitting in a member’s account, meaning a significant proportion of activity remains untrackable, Wolf argues.

    The double takeaway here is that not everything that counts can be counted and not everything that can be counted counts.

    The official “money manager” category is both likely missing some fund activity and capturing an element which is passive rather than active, causing that built-in bias to the long side.

    SHADOW DYNAMICS

    Wolf doesn’t dispute the spike in fund longs in the copper market earlier this year. Marex’s own methodology caught the same trend-driven buying momentum.

    ALSO IN COMMODITIES

    OPEC panel looking at deepening, extending oil cuts: sources
    Full tanks and tankers: a stubborn oil glut despite OPEC cuts
    But he does caution that there may be more going on in that all-time long fund position apparently accumulated on the CME copper contract than might at first meet the eye.

    Drawing on an extensive analysis of the WTI oil market, Wolf makes a case that a cross-commodity increase in speculative length may be investment structures moving from the over-the-counter shadows to the exchange space.

    “Structuring producer hedges set off against pension fund investor length was a good business to be in” a couple of years ago before it was undermined by the way new regulations treat commodities on bank balance sheets, Wolf notes.

    As such instruments come to the end of their fixed terms, they are being rolled onto exchanges, inflating the apparent fund presence, he argues.

    Copper is a core component of all the big commodity indices and would be included in any such shadow-land investment basket.

    Another shifting dynamic is what appears to be a flow of speculative activity out of China towards both the CME and the LME, according to Wolf.

    Copper open interest on the Shanghai Futures Exchange (ShFE) fell by just over 1.5 million tonnes over the second half of 2016.

    Some of this may have found a new home in the CME copper contract, although Wolf argues that more actually appeared to migrate to the LME over the same timeframe.

    That may seem strange given all the hullabaloo about falling LME volumes, but much of that decline has taken place on the short-dated carries that don’t exist in the CME’s futures structure.

    Strip those out of the equation and compare CME open interest and open interest on the LME third Wednesday prime prompts and “the view that (CME) is taking share consistently from the LME is not supported by the data.”

    MORE RECORD HIGHS

    Leakage of passive money across categories, leakage of OTC investment assets onto exchanges and leakage of speculative money out of China may all be inflating funds’ apparent participation in copper.

    Wolf’s bold call is that “we don’t see the speculative community as positioned for a bull market in base metals at all”.

    You may not agree, but if he’s right it’s only a matter of time before we see new “record” fund longs in copper on both sides of the Atlantic.

    Except they won’t be true “records” if the components of the count have been subtly changing all the time.

    (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)

    (Editing by Susan Fenton)